Proportionality Principle as a Response Instrument to Challenges of Modern Labour Law

Authors

  • Ekaterine Kardava

Keywords:

proportionality principle, Oakes Proportionality test, three-stage proportionality test, just cause, privacy cases, picketing, discrimination, AA.

Abstract

Proportionality Principle is the fundamental principle of public and private laws and the basic regulatory instrument of modern relations measuring the use of power. Integration of the principle into the labour law in the form of systematized test (three-stage test) - is the subject of recent debates. The issue is actual caused by contradiction between the traditional approaches of the labour law and modern labour market challenges. The proportionality principle and the application of its structured test to labour relations’ debates is considered as one of the responsive mechanism to the challenging process. It is addressed in labour cases not only for the analyzing of employers but employees (mostly trade unions) actions, as well for final assessment and decision-making. The practice still is developing. It echoes the modern process within of which there are discussion on possibilities of modification of labour law doctrinal objectives.  It implies changes of selective nature of the labour low towards the universal. The study on the practice of application of proportionality and its development within the national labour law of Georgia  is the subject of utmost interest with regard to the fulfillment of the Association Agreement and transposition of European standards into the national legislations. Georgia should conduct the legal approximation activities in labour law field, which requires the complex and systemized vision: not only setting of compliance with EU directives, but cognition of the principles, which are the bases for interpretation of the AA norms and their use in practice.

References

Association Agreement between the European Union and the European Atomic Energy Community and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part”, 27.06.14, <https://eeas.europa.eu/sites/eeas/files/association_agreement.pdf>.

“Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Communities and their Member States, of the one part, and Georgia, of the other part”, 22.04.96, entered into force 01.07.99, <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:31999D0515>.

Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, Official Journal L 303 , 02/12/2000, 0016 – 0022, <http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1474273510720&uri=CELEX:02000L0078-20001202 >.

Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act, <http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/PDF/P-8.6.pdf >.

Davidov G., Alon-Shenker P., Applying the Principle of Proportionality in Employment and Labour Law Contexts, McGill Law Journal / Revue de droit de McGill, Vol. 59, № 2, 2013, 375-380, 382-388, 390-395, 399, 403, 408-410, 413-416, 419, <https://www.erudit.org/revue/mlj/2013/ v59/n2/ 1022312 ar.html>; <https://www.erudit.org/revue/mlj/2013/v59/n2/1022312ar.pdf>.

Davidov G., the Principle of Proportionality in Labor Law and its Impact on Precarious Workers, 10/11/2012, 63, 64, <http://law.huji.ac.il/upload/Davidov34-1FINAL.pdf >.

Davidov G., The Goals of Regulating Work: Between Universalism and Selectivity, introduction, Labour Law Research Network, 2012, 1-2, 5,

<http://www.labourlawresearch.net/sites/default/files/papers/Regulating%20Work%20--%20Between%20Universality%20and%20Selectivity%20final.pdf >.

Deakin S., The Contract of Employment, A Study in Legal Evolution, University of Cambridge, ESRC Center form Business Research, Working Paper № 203, 2001, 4-5,

<http://www.cbr.cam.ac.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/centre-for-business-research/downloads/working-papers/wp203.pdf>.

Labour Law: Its Role, Trends and Potential, Labour Education 2006/2-3, №143-144, V, <http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_dialogue/@actrav/documents/publication/wcms_111442.pdf >.

Macneil I.R., Relational Contract, Wisconsin Law Review, 1985, 483-526, <http://www.cisr.ru/ files/publ/lib_pravo/Macneil%201985%20Relational%20contract.pdf>.

Piera L., The Reasonableness and Proportionality Principle in Labour, Labour Law Research Network, Inaugural Conference, Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, June 13-15, 2013, 3-4, <https://portal.upf.edu/documents/3298481/3410076/2013-LLRNConf_Loi.pdf/a1992ca6-3376-4e87-a40f-bc3a8250d189>.

Waas B., The Principle of Proportionality in German Labour Law, Goethe Universität, LLRN Barcelona Conference, June 2013.

Published

2017-07-31

How to Cite

Kardava, E. (2017). Proportionality Principle as a Response Instrument to Challenges of Modern Labour Law. Journal of Law, (1). Retrieved from https://jlaw.tsu.ge/index.php/JLaw/article/view/1846

Issue

Section

Articles